Qianhui Tang vs Kira Pavlova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
Q. Tang vs K. Pavlova

Qianhui Tang
CHN
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
0
Win
2
Played
2
Win
25
Age
21
-
Height
-
818
C. Rank
430
617
Best Rank
353
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.9K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Kira Pavlova
RUS
l
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
l
0
Win
2
Played
2
Win
25
Age
21
-
Height
-
818
C. Rank
430
617
Best Rank
353
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.9K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Tang 0 - 2 Pavlova
They have played 4 sets in total, with Qianhui Tang winning 0 and Kira Pavlova winning 4. The last match between Kira Pavlova and Qianhui Tang was at the W100 Incheon, 01-09-2024, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Kira Pavlova getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tang | 0 |
| Pavlova | 2 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W100 Incheon(09-01-24)
Kira Pavlova
6
6
Qianhui Tang
4
2
(R1) W35 Kunshan(08-21-24)
Kira Pavlova
6
6
Qianhui Tang
1
2
Q. Tang vs K. Pavlova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,860 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 49.13% (85-88) | Career Total W/L | 55.74% (131-104) |
| 0 | Hard | 2 |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
Q. Tang vs K. Pavlova Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Qianhui Tang has won 35.46% of points on their second serve, while Kira Pavlova has won 36.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Qianhui Tang, in recent form, has won 48.59% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kira Pavlova has won 48.70%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.47% and 36.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Qianhui Tang has saved 43.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kira Pavlova has saved 43.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Qianhui Tang has won 27.27% of matches played (W/L 3/8), with Kira Pavlova winning 53.13% (W/L 34/30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Qianhui Tang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 66/64), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 15/20). Kira Pavlova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 17/12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 1/3).
- Player level: In the last year, Qianhui Tang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 16.67% of matches (W/L 1/5), where as Kira Pavlova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 24/27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Qianhui Tang winning 0 times and Kira Pavlova being victorious 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Qianhui Tang winning 0 and Kira Pavlova winning 4.
- The last match between Qianhui Tang and Kira Pavlova was at the W100 Incheon, 01-09-2024, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Kira Pavlova getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Qianhui Tang has played against opponents with an average rank of 428.64 while Kira Pavlova has played against players with an average rank of 403.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Qianhui Tang has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kira Pavlova has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Qianhui Tang has converted 35.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kira Pavlova has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Qianhui Tang vs Kira Pavlova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Q. Tang vs K. Pavlova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 9 | Games Won | 24 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:28:30 | Average Match Time | 1:28:30 |
| 64% (79/123) | 1st Serve % | 64% (62/97) |
| 42% (33/79) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (41/62) |
| 39% (17/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (21/35) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 48% (12/25) |
| 36% (35/97) | Return Points Win % | 59% (73/123) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Tang 43%, Pavlova 44%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Tang 58%, Pavlova 58%.
Break Points Saved %: Tang 49%, Pavlova 51%.
Q. Tang Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-0 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-0 6-0 | ||
K. Pavlova Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 5-2 ret. | ||
SF | L | 5-1 ret. | ||
QF | W | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||

Q. Tang vs K. Pavlova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 49.13% (85/88) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.74% (131/104) |
| 50.50% (202/198) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.53% (296/237) |
| 51.62% (1877/1759) | Games Win/Loss | 52.70% (2510/2253) |
| 50.77% (66/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.94% (113/89) |
| 42.86% (15/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.62% (17/12) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 196 | Aces Total | 91 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.43 |
| 329 | Total Double Faults | 1006 |
| 1:10:33 | Average Match Time | 1:31:46 |
| 518.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 409.66 |
| 63% (5056/7976) | 1st Serve % | 60% (8317/13841) |
| 59% (2981/5056) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4893/8317) |
| 43% (1258/2920) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2391/5524) |
| 47% (487/1042) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1019/1950) |
| 46% (3769/8143) | Return Points Win % | 49% (6880/13910) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 48.28% (56/60) | Challenger W/L | 54.65% (94/78) |
| 54.90% (28/23) | Futures W/L | 59.68% (37/25) |
| 50% (84/169) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (129/230) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (14/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 69% (20/29) |
| 42% (22/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (32/68) |
| 78% (93/73) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (135/119) |
| 22% (93/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (135/16) |
| 15% (80/12) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (100/12) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
11:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction03:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-10
H2H 0-0
23:05
H2H 1-0
00:10
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal